Kolaboro / Editorial policy
Editorial policy
How we choose what to cover, how a fact gets on a page, who is accountable, when pages are reviewed and how we correct mistakes.
Reviewed on . Next scheduled review: .
What we publish
- Facts about off-plan projects that a developer, its sales agents, a listing, an official register, a court, a regulator or the press made public, each with the address of its source and the date we read it.
- Where we find nothing, the page says "not published". We do not fill gaps with estimates.
- Scores computed by published rules, so anyone can recompute them.
- No verdicts on named companies: we show what is public and what we could check.
How we choose what to cover
- We cover off-plan projects marketed to buyers, found on developer websites, listing portals and official registers.
- A project is added when its developer or a sales page publishes it. Nobody can pay to be added, removed or ranked.
- Projects of companies linked to a Kolaboro founder are never reviewed or ranked. Projects in Sumba appear only in the Sumba transparency ranking.
- Projects added but not yet read by our researchers are labelled "not yet reviewed".
How a fact gets on a page
- We read the source and keep a dated copy with its SHA-256 fingerprint.
- We record the fact with the address of the source and the date we read it.
- Where an official register is open, we look the fact up there and record the result.
- Scheduled jobs re-read the sources and record what changed.
- A person reviews every developer reply and every buyer report before it is published.
Moderation policy · Where our facts come from
Who is accountable
Kolaboro is run by its two founders, as presented on our About and Team pages:
- Carlos de Ory: CEO, leads product and growth
- Ignacio Hojas García-Plaza: co-founder, leads data, register integrations, the API and partnerships
Data and method: Ignacio Hojas García-Plaza, co-founder, who leads data and register integrations. Published by Kolaboro, operated by Equinox Investment Group LLC.
Team and method · About Kolaboro
When pages are reviewed
- Project pages and rankings are recomputed each time a data file changes. Our jobs run every day: see how we work.
- Guides, method pages and this policy are re-read at least every three months. Each shows the date of its last review and of the next one.
- The transparency score method has a version number. A change to its points gets a new version, a date and a line in the changelog.
Method version 1.0, in use since ; points unchanged since then. Next method review: . Transparency score method · How we work
Corrections
- Every project page has a "Report a correction" link. Developers can also reply on their own pages.
- When a fact is wrong we fix it and log the date, what the page said, what it says now and why.
- Errors we find ourselves, for example in our accuracy checks, are logged the same way.
Reuse of our data
- Our data and rankings are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0, with the credit "Kolaboro, kolaboro.com".
- Our CSV and JSON data files carry the licence in their Link header, and the pages that offer them say so.
- The scoring rules are published as open-source code (MIT licence).
- We do not collect personal data about private individuals.
How to cite · Data policy · CC BY 4.0
What we do not do
- No paid placements: developers never pay us.
- No legal, tax or financial advice: facts, and questions to ask.
- No reviews or ratings unless they come from verified buyers.
- No made-up examples: an illustrative example is labelled as fictional on the example itself.